You have to remember and type
During the conversation, the physician is taking the history, examining the patient, and thinking about how to write it all up.
AudioProtocol listens to the conversation between physician and patient, produces a transcript, and helps assemble a draft medical record from your template. The physician remains the author of the final record.
Demo interface with synthetic data. The draft is built from facts confirmed during the conversation.
Ordinary dictation produces a block of text. AudioProtocol builds a draft by the sections of a medical record and shows where each fact came from.
Filling in the record manually takes attention away from the patient and eats into time after the consultation.
During the conversation, the physician is taking the history, examining the patient, and thinking about how to write it all up.
Symptoms, negations, duration, dosages, and clarifications are easy to miss when filling in from memory.
Medical documentation takes time that could go to the next patient, a clinical decision, or rest.
The system helps prepare documentation but does not make clinical decisions for the physician.
A transparent process in which the physician keeps control of the content.
Choose a specialty and a template, then turn on recording in the working window.
Automatic audio processing: the system recognizes speech, produces an accurate transcript, and separates utterances by participant, with no manual transcription needed.
AI extracts only medically relevant information, taking into account the speaker's role, negations, timing, and the supporting quote. Uncertain information is flagged for review.
The draft is built by template section. The physician edits, accepts or rejects facts, and completes the record.
The physician's and the patient's speech appears in the working window as the consultation unfolds.
Complaints, history, examination, diagnoses, orders, and other data are sorted into the fields of the record.
The system distinguishes the speaker's role, negations, and timing of events; unconfirmed information is not presented as a finished conclusion.
Each fact keeps a link to the utterance and the exact quote, so the physician can quickly check the basis.
The record structure, priority fields, and medical terminology are configured for the consultation profile.
The system flags unfilled required fields, duplicates, and possible contradictions for the physician's final review.
Availability of individual features depends on the selected configuration and the implementation stage.
Hover over or tap a fact: the source utterance and the record field are highlighted. The demo data is entirely synthetic.
The physician alone makes the final decision on the content of the medical record.
Less routine after the consultation, more attention to the conversation, and a quick review of the draft.
A uniform documentation format and a clear rollout plan for the team.
A tool for digitalizing consultations, with manageable settings, roles, and a rollout path.
Templates can be configured to fit the clinic's workflow: .
Deployment on-premises, inside the medical organization's network, is possible; the model and data do not have to leave its infrastructure.
Flexible access management for consultations and settings, based on the roles of the organization's staff.
Each medical fact keeps its link to the source utterance and to the physician's actions.
The system does not establish a diagnosis or prescribe treatment. It produces a draft based on speech; responsibility for the medical record and the decision remains with the physician.
Implementation starts with the physician's workflow, not with buying technology.
We define the specialties, record templates, and workstation requirements.
We assess usability for physicians, the quality of completion, and data processing rules.
We set up the chosen environment, roles, templates, and, if needed, an integration route with the MIS.
The integration approach and delivery format are determined after a technical assessment.
It is an approach in which the physician has an ordinary conversation with the patient, while the system recognizes speech, extracts medical facts, and assembles them into a draft consultation record. The physician reviews and approves the final record.
The physician selects a specialty and a template and turns on recording. Depending on the configuration, separate audio sources or a speaker recognition module are used. If attribution is uncertain, the information is flagged for review.
No. AudioProtocol prepares a transcript and a draft record. The physician verifies the facts, edits, and approves the final record.
Yes. The physician can adjust, accept, or reject the suggested facts before completing the consultation.
The structure depends on the configured templates and specialties. During the demo, we will show the options available for your scenario.
This is determined by the delivery model and the clinic's policy. Operation on the clinic's own infrastructure is possible; the audio retention period is configured separately. The data processing scheme is agreed with the clinic during the implementation project.
The integration route is discussed after a technical assessment, taking into account the MIS in use, templates, and information security requirements.
Yes. If the conversation is recorded during a consultation, the implementation project includes a procedure for informing the patient and obtaining consent, as well as a policy for audio retention and access. We work through these issues with the clinic during the preparation phase.
We will show the workflow and discuss specialties, templates, and a secure implementation option.